brett sits at #1 again with a league-high 2085.22 points and 83 all-play wins, proof that a 9-5 record can occasionally reflect actual quality. joe holds at #2 on the back of 78 all-play wins despite a pedestrian 7-7 mark, which is either impressive or a condemnation of the rest of the league, we haven't decided.
scott climbs to #3 despite a losing record of 6-8, propped up almost entirely by 2039.89 points for and a tidy 58.2 average starter rank — he's spending his money well too, or rather he isn't, sitting at $0 faab like a man who already bought what he needed. will, meanwhile, owns the best record in the league at 10-4 and still drops to #4, undone by a 93.0 average starter rank and only 69 all-play wins, the fewest of anyone in the top five. wins are nice. efficiency has opinions.
boyer jumps two spots to #5 while still hoarding $80 in faab, the fiscal equivalent of a squirrel that forgot where it buried anything. jordan also gains two spots at #6 despite leaving a league-worst 26.93 points on the bench weekly, which suggests the starting lineup is doing just enough to cover for the guys who apparently
| # | team | w | ovw | pts | opt | rr | faab | total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (–) | Brett | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 0.83 | 48.83 |
| 2 (–) | Joe | 5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 1.0 | 38.0 |
| 3 (+1) | Scott | 3 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 0.17 | 36.17 |
| 4 (-1) | Will | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1.17 | 33.17 |
| 5 (+2) | Boyer | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1.67 | 24.67 |
| 6 (+2) | Jordan | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 1.33 | 23.33 |
| 7 (-1) | Josh | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0.17 | 23.17 |
| 8 (-3) | David | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0.17 | 22.17 |
| 9 (–) | Chu | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 1.5 | 17.5 |
| 10 (–) | Mike | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.17 | 11.17 |
w/ovw/pts/opt/rr/faab are 1–10 category scores (faab capped at 1.67); full methodology is Will's six-category formula.